On the one hand ... |
|
|
|
| Opinion | |||
| Written by The Jewish Chronicle | |||
| Friday, 17 July 2009 11:00 | |||
|
We feel like Teyve in “Fiddler”: One the one hand, it’s bad that President Obama felt he had to meet this week with American Jewish leaders for some hand-holding after grumbling over his Middle East diplomacy grew loud. On the other hand, it’s good that the president has enough sensitivity to Jewish concerns to call the meeting. On the one hand, it’s bad that Obama makes Jewish settlements in the disputed West Bank the whipping boy for lack of progress toward peace between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. On the other hand, the worst of the settlers are violent fanatics, and those outside the main blocs must leave in any case to achieve the two-state solution that seems essential to Israeli survival, certainly as a democracy. We can only discern the “pressure” on us, and it’s uncomfortable. We don’t know what Obama is saying to the Arabs and Iranians behind the scenes, but we know they’ve been uncompromising in the past, and we fear the same in the future. But Obama is not Jimmy Carter. He still has the support of most Americans, and most American Jews, in his new, “soft power” approach to the Middle East. He’s already done more to shake the foundations beneath the Iranian mullahs than Bush-Cheney managed. President Obama may be wrong about the ultimate cause of that failure, but he’s correct that the previous eight years of staunch U.S. support for Israel didn’t bring peace. And he’s earned the right to try a new approach.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Hits: 1109 Trackback(0)Comments (3)
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|




